Saturday, October 31, 2009

Political Risk Excerpt: New Moon Mission

The whump whump of the CH-47 Chinook’s rotor blades was heard overhead by the surviving soldiers of a double-nickel A-team at the designated southern Afghanistan desert LZ. Corporal Audrey Kinsey, now the officer in command, lit a flare that sparked whitish red-hot, illuminating a barren clearing and the gritty-bearded bull-dog face of Delta Force Marcus Olmead, wearing a palko and chapan. They had retreated just in time to make their rendezvous after a fierce firefight with the Taliban. Casualty count was two KIA, three wounded.

Olmead feared the worse for his partner, Jason Atwood, wounded and left behind but he had no choice. Corporal Kinsey and the others, unfamiliar with the landmark barren terrain, would have taken twice as long in their retreat - even with NVG's and GPS handhelds - missing their rendezvous or chancing another encounter with the Taliban. He had a blood-hound instinct to double time them since he knew this region better than his boyhood rural backyard home in North Carolina. Atwood wouldn't have it any other way.


When the Chinook’s rear ramp was lowered - spilling out a reddish glow - Kinsey and the others piled in carrying two wounded. Olmead helped with radioman 18 Echo, who had RPG shrapnel bits peppered into his back. The other casualty, Private First Class Michael Lindsey, had taken an AK-47 slug in the rectum. He was nearly bled out. Wasting no time, Olmead climbed over the exhausted grunts, making his way to the pilot’s cockpit. Shouting above the helicopter's whining engines he gave a report to the co-pilot.

-Major Wayne Kaplan and Private First Class Thomas Peterson are KIA. You got two wounded, one is pretty bad. Get a ‘commo blackout control number’ on all four. Can’t have their families kicked out of military housing.

The co-pilot acknowledged Olmead in the affirmative thumbs up.

-And you never saw me.

Olmead returned to the rear of the Chinook. He purposely didn't say anything about Atwood. That was classified. Olmead and Atwood were a Delta Team. Once out in the field, they operated with immunity and autonomy, taking commands from an "operational controller" who could be someone at CENTCOM, the CIA or even a significant political leader. They were the 'eyes-an-ears' in the opium rich Helmand region of southern Afghanistan.

Corporal Kinsey’s blood stained hand grabbed Olmead’s arm as he passed by her.

-Where're you going?
-Apocalypso.

That was Atwood’s code name to the A-team members.

-He's probably dead.
-The shit he is, Corporal.

Kinsey recoiled from the fierce look Olmead shot at her and the fact he reached for his side arm. In no uncertain terms would he not use it if she pressed him further. Kinsey released her grip.

-You had your fucking chance out there and you blew it, Kinsey. I'm sorry that the major bit the big one, but Atwood warned you it was a flawed strategy. You got two dead and god-fucking-forbid my partner makes three.

A Chinook crewman started to close the hydraulic ramp as the Chinook pilot throttled up for take off. Olmead with just one chance to bail wasn’t going to miss it. Kinsey yelled to him as he darted for the ramp.

-The package wasn't a tribal leader. That air strip is owned by the Saudis. It's used for falcon hunting. We were supposed to smash-and-grab a Saudi prince.

-Fucking A, Olmead yelled back at Kinsey as he took a leap out of the airborne Chinook, free-falling for a moment, hitting the hard desert surface in a bone-bruising thud.

Picking himself up Olmead started running blindly through the Chinook’s prop-wash-dust cloud. Soon all that he heard was his boots pounding on the hard-paned desert flatness in the pitch black new moon night; backtracking to where he left Atwood, hoping his partner was still breathing and worse of all hadn’t been taken prisoner by the Taliban.

byronic

byronic

Friday, October 16, 2009

DECLASSIFIED

DECLASSIFIED

To Operative Goldilocks: CODED TRANSMISSION dated [redaction] gather information for agency’s purpose - North Vietnamese official code name [redaction] first feed – “Hanoi need massive Chinese intervention to prevent total collapse.” Source of transmission - Saigon. Directive: Find mole in Saigon.


Goldilocks, shallow breathing, shirt saturated perspiration, sniffing the fragrance from a hermaphroditic flower bouquet mixed with chlorine stink mop cleaning in Saigon hotel hallway, pursues “mole” delegate rodent-pig jackal – puppet for Ho Chi Minh, traitor to South Vietnam. Ear listening piece receives microphone bug clever placement behind rodent-pig jackal’s mirror.


While listening, Goldilocks’ relives attack like combat rehearsal with Lashing Link and skull crushing Flying Giant Stork Death Kick blow pulverizing Soviet Agent Dog Talk’s heart, before commie-pig give up rodent-pig jackal’s identification. Dog Talk six foot five, two hundred-eighty pounds; classic American stereotype blonde blue-eyed blend-in as foreign journalist, but has no American swagger. Dead give away. Goldilocks only four foot nine, one hundred forty-five pounds sinewy Vietnamese. Runt with lightning speed hands like Leopard paws, muscle like Lion.



To Operative Goldilocks: CODED TRANSMISSION dated [redaction] Soviet noc compromised – good work. Rodent-pig jackal warmongering clique to strengthen pressure on peace-talk failure; prove Ho Chi Minh [redaction] expect military improvement from Chinese through next year. Urgent: Rodent-pig jackal turned Operative Piranha; guilty of counter espionage. Directive: Conditions warrant [redaction] by Goldilocks.


Late at night, Goldilocks pick lock, gain silent entry to Operative Piranha’s secret safe house, dim room reek of acrid cigarette smoke. Inching toward my once glorious lover who gripped me in Kama Sutra Waterfallposition organism resembling screeching cat, I construct fertility attack standing above her bed; lift hand palm strike pose to her gentle face, must think she is vile rodent, but sallow whisper come from my lips, “My true nature is kind.” Piranha wake, reflex pitch squeal correct action, prompt defense posture. She makes Piranha Strike punch to my gut, then summersault from bed like invisible wind. Fully visible in black silk pajama’s, open blouse expose her breasts; seeing me her voice fails. Betrayed - only in split second - we both want to vomit.


Our eyes lock. Combat skill based on split second reactive peripheral vision. Who we suppose to be, comrades then enemy? Shrug. I convey Bashing Baboon against her deltoid, miss breaking neck. Talcum powder on table, she tosses... trying to blind me while making Kangaroo Kick aimed at groin, but her foot hit my leg, almost crush knee; I crow:


“Accept my gratitude, Piranha. I make death quick.”
“Tank you, very much,” she say lunging at me in Barracuda Deadly Eye Gouge pose.


We fight in blinding spins, knuckles and feet smash furniture and walls, blood leaks from mouth, feet swing high and wide, bone jarring body blows by hand chops; finally in skip stride with injured knee I flatten her with Whirling Wolverine, utilizing foot heel to reproductive solar plexus acupressure point. Flat on her back, chest heaving, large eyed, knotted face, Piranha utters, “I preg…” just as I execute palm thrust, skull crack like fiberglass, eyes tilt to side. Pupils dilate. Talcum powder falls like snowflakes on Piranha’s lifeless body.



From Operative Goldilocks: DECODED TRANSMISSION to DIRECTORATE OF OPERATIONS date [redaction] Piranha decommission with child. Operative Goldilocks voices open-minded maggot position for psy-op. Shame rodent-pig jackal - expose covert political jackal’s clique. Force Ho into negotiations to end Vietnam War. Claim to turn rodent-pig jackal into provocateur asset. Analysis: Goldilocks off reservation; might be feeding us misinformation. Forfeits covert cover. Directive: Insert Operative Horse Whispering for [redaction].


Horse Whispering arrive from Hanoi. In night, pounces on Goldilocks in Saigon back alley. “Tanks for saving life in Cambodia,” Horse Whispering says in ear of tight yellow skin-faced Vietnamese operative with barrel of gun pressed against his head. Goldilocks most confused operative, locked from behind in tight arm grip around neck by Horse Whispering. “You can’t out run a bullet.”


From Operative Goldilocks: DECODED TRANSMISSION date [redaction] to DIRECTORATE OF OPERATIONS: Horse Whispering body parts arrive next week. Regret kill two friends. CIA all parasitic vultures.

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Portrait of a Woman

It is a watercolor portrait of an anonymous naked woman. The perspective is from her backside - sharp outlined dark-brown hues frame her pear-shaped figure - seated with legs crossed upon a spit of land that juts out from the right-hand corner. Metaphorically this piece of land is her skala – which means in Russian a rock solid foundation. I know Vera painted it this way, because she referred to that word repeatedly during an arduous immigration to America.

The woman portrait is meditating upon the eastern horizon, an aesthetic optimism. What pervades is the sun, a vibrant bright yellow that creeps up above the ocean’s horizon, casting sparkling light off the ripples of a vast dark blue ocean. The sky is bleached white with hints of light blue. The ocean is central to her journey; that which Vera, my lover, had crossed in absolute single-mindedness to remain with me, uprooted from her homeland.

The watercolor’s subtle stage is engrossing by a combination of elements; water, sun, earth, and ether that pervades in our flesh and blood. It captures that odd law that art deals with what we see and feel, limited in acute awareness, the provision of interest that we read into it. Just as the watercolor vision animates sensibility, the woman’s mild posture and sunrise ocean view – the subject matter – is determined by her feelings of longing to return from where she came. The woman in the painting is both generous and sensitive in form, just as Vera was to me. Vulnerable in the objectivity of this simplistic scenic consistency the element of execution is portioned to the moment; there is no over-treatment of feeling, no meaningless distinction of what she wants to convey to me.

During Vera’s time of transition, I encouraged her to carve on paper with brush and paint without regard to technical or formal restrictions, but instead from that valid “germ” that is inevitably the affirmation of inspiration. It was meant as a cathartic approach given the demands of a foreign culture thrust upon her. When living behind the Iron Curtain, her perspective of Western culture promised individual prosperity, an idyllic freedom of choice to achieve one’s potential. Once upon its soil, she discovered all the restrictive socioeconomic crudities that became painfully obvious, and in some instances, even more so than what she had left behind. Disillusioned, I thought an artistic outlet would relieve the angst.

Before Vera left, I would cast a glance at this painting placed upon her altar’s easel, one among dozens, but it had not grabbed me nor tangled its connection around my heart until she departed. Now in these aching moments of separation I regret to have not praised her work more openly, discussed and analyzed the symbolism in ways that would have drawn out of her psyche those submerged thoughts she had learned to bury. As she would reflect about her childhood memories, her parents strictly enforced in fear of political reprisals, “We only opened our lips to eat.”

Starring back at me, the watercolor sits next to a palette dappled in dried mixtures of colors. Her cleaned brushes are neatly placed, arranged in order of their width next to a pile of partially filled tubes of paint. Left alone with these artifacts and no distractions of her presence, I’m caught in the scenic painting’s consistency, at first with avoidance to go behind the meaning. What eventually filtered through my mind was the compositional accruement enriched by the why that confronted me The provision of interest which consists in placing advantageously right in the middle of the sunlight, this mirror of Vera’s self, connected to the garden of life that I know she cherished deep in her heart. She had built a massive highly productive summer garden in our backyard, making it a daily horticulture project. She did that as a means in replicating the village life she left behind.

True to her shy, subtle disposition, Vera posited this final watercolor image in perfect sense. I am now aware of how cunningly she courageously held the secret of her personal hardship. Life in a capitalistic auto-driven, consumer- based exurbia with an imbroglio economy on the skids was not only suffocating her, but reminding her of the traumas after the collapse of the Soviet Union. In that regard there is nothing superficial about how delicately balanced her last watercolor painting improvised to me her inner monologue that went unspoken between us.

In her own way, this watercolor rendered the opening of her heart to my own frail vessel of mind. Ironically, even upon my suggestion, I blundered. I had become pessimistic about our future; unemployed, unable to pay our bills, the threat of losing our home, the culmination of all that I had worked for was crumbling about me, us. This is the way things happen, lessons in reality that life is all confusion. Fraught with the uncertainty of our future, I failed to reinforce the exquisite essence of her existence that could sustain me. .

She lived in absolutes, pragmatically in concentrated feelings about anything, squeezing out its value. But I lack these traits, so I don’t know if she was dismissing me as a fool or admonishing me since the woman in the painting had its back toward me. Or is she is showing me that a new horizon is there for the taking. Vera, whether metaphysically or not, aimed her last painting directly at me before returning to her village birthplace. With a deep sigh, I utter skala.

Friday, April 3, 2009


President George W. Bush:
The Antithesis of George Washington


President George Washington’s rendition of America was “a Land of Promise… for the poor, the needy, & oppressed of the Earth.” This land possessed the most massive treasure trove for individual prosperity in the 18th century, of which its future brought atrocities upon the continent’s indigenous people, a legacy of massive cultural migration, a bloody civil war, women’s suffrage, civil rights, and economic depression; we as a nation have run riot to the brink of ruin, for better or worse.

Public opinion of a” long war to end terrorism” strategy has become steadfast in the minds of Americans, despite the cumulative body count of Iraqi men, women and children brutally murdered by US manufactured precision aerial bombing raids and over 250,000 rounds of bullets fired per Iraqi insurgent’s death, fabricated under false pretenses of imminent attack by Iraq.

Operation Iraqi Freedom’s overthrow of Saddam Hussein’s regime pales to the immediate threat of Bush acquiring the largest defense budget in the world, condones torture, illegally enacts unitary executive powers from the Oval Office, and plans to build civilian inmate labor camps in secret locations in America to quarantine the “undesirables.”

But the greatest mischief’s to befall American are yet to come. Unlike George Washington, immune to the seductions of dictatorial power after defending an invincible British military, George W. Bush has harbored no illusions about coercive unitary executive authority that abolishes the true “Spirit of ’76.”

As President Bush pushed through the Patriot Act by underhanded coercive means, namely one provision buried in its verbiage is his “fast-track” system to execute prisoners, guilty or not; as an “enemy of the state” Fifth Columnist will soon be incarcerated in Civilian Inmate Labor camps, under the control of the Army Corp of Engineers.[1]

We cannot know, at this time the fullest extent of what is afoot within the devious secrecy of the Oval Office, but it is clear that what measures the Bush-Cheney administration are openly pronouncing in strenuous efforts to expand and duplicate his “text-book” example of the Texas death row kill ratio of 152 executed, one pardoned; a protective indispensable status for a precarious cause of dictatorial-like ethos for “civilian control” by shredding the constitution’s Fourth Amendment under a limitless firsthand usurping to the right of a fair trial and appeal process before execution.

When Bush was governor in Texas, Alberto Gonzales provided a “no-brakes” “dumbed-down” process for death row executions, eliminating legal appeals under the arguments of “ineffective counsel, conflict of interest, mitigating evidence and even actual evidence of innocence,” reported by the Atlantic Monthly.

Logistically stripping the checks and balances of the three branches of government and the judiciary supervision of solitary interpretation of Congressional legislation; initiated by a Reagan-Bush agenda to cut all that red tape for societal delinquent executions, led by deceased Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist -- who claimed there are never any egregious errors in cases before the government flipped the electrocution switch -- the Bush-Cheney regime has realigned principles of state sovereignty by placing military jurisdiction over Congress, something that George Washington adamantly insisted upon being the reverse to preserve the civil rights of every American civilian.

Chris Floyd wrote in his Global Eye article, Bone Thugs[2] The Patriot Act gives “Bush an agenda to kill a whole heap of”, what the Pentagon are calling Fifth Columnists, anti-Bushists. What’s next? The jack-boot Provisional Terrorist Act that can declare any American citizen and “enemy combatant” and imprison them without charges, trial or legal rights guaranteed under the Constitution, put them into forced labor or extermination?


SWARM OF LIES

In Dahr Jamail’s recent article, “Operation Swarm of Lies”, he lucidly pointed out that the news report was a distraction to US and UK military actions in Iran killing 21 civilians. Again the proficiency of the military’s reputation carries forward the chronic provision of “free-fire zone justice” directly in violation of international law.

What raises the red flag of fascism is when I read, “Most importantly, however, is the human tragedy, which Operation Swarm of Lies has both generated as well as diverted attention from” the hundreds of families displaced, fleeing the city of Samarra.

The tolerance for casualties of innocent Iraqis is in fact the American ideology hat squanders away the human value system, when its corporate “Daddy War Bucks” holding company, e.g. Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA)[3] is acutely sensitive to their war profiteering bottom line, and not the split blood of children.

The relevant fact is not about whether US troops should pull out of Iraq, it is not about “victory” at all cost over “terrorism”, or quelling a civil war between Sunnis and Shiites, but in reality translates into the god-awful disgust of the capacities of an educated civilization, ruthlessly killing innocent people, a ratio well over 40 Iraqis to 1 US soldier in this case, that is building a militarized ghetto as future labor camps in the whole of Iraq; clear evidence of the Bush-Cheney regime’s malignant disposition towards the Iraqi people that is seeping into American legislation, i.e., The Patriot Act.

The great prize of victory, the military marching – flag waving, confetti showering victory parade down Pennsylvania Avenue, (which I witnessed after the Gulf War) is not intended for ending terrorism – but the triumph of keeping the Bush-Cheney regime from collapsing us into attainment of fast-track genocide; but before the “Daddy Warbucks” Congress has milked every last penny from humankind’s labor force; diverting attention from corporate personhood’s civil rights by generating the existence of a general fatalistic national security panic that Iran -- the center of terrorist banking -- is on the verge of starting a nuclear war.

American media has accomplished the poignant tone that the neo-con’s “war on terrorism” based on false intelligence that Saddam Hussein possessed WMD’s and was preparing a terrorist attack upon American soil, now debates it as if they are reporting about the pros and cons of a tourist attraction.

But the fact remains; George Washington’s patriotism has been desecrated by purposeful designed under a the Bush-Cheney corporate personhood elitist’s neo-con fraternal unilateral pre-emptive strike for an Iraqi society to be lead to a speedy death, meticulously censored journalism, obscuring the documented framework of constructing modern day ghettos in Iraq.


TAL AFAR – THE NEW IRAQ GHETTO

President Bush recently stood before the members of the City Club of Cleveland in his glorious tribute, claiming that Tal Afar, once a city gripped by terrorist oppression, is now free and undergoing a vibrant revitalization.

Bush proudly told the audience that in two weeks time US troops killed 150 terrorists and captured another 850, winning the citizen’s confidence of a US lead democracy. Bush said, “…we know it because the people of Tal Afar are showing their gratitude, adding a quote from the city’s mayor Najim Abdullah Abid Al-Jibouri calling the US soldier’s, “avenging angels sent by the god himself to fight the evil of terrorism.”

For a moment, let’s revisit Dahr’s “Operation Swarm of Lies” where he writes in contrast to Bush’s glossy patronage;

“The Director of the Monitoring Net of Human Rights in Iraq (MHRI), Muhamad al-Deraji, issued an appeal to the UN mission in Baghdad regarding violations committed by the US military operation near Samarra. Though the locations are separate, the actions are the same.

“We have received information from citizens and human rights activist in Samarra stating that the region, under American and Iraqi military operation… is witnessing dangerous human rights violations, which is confirmed by the following:
1) The Red Crescent aiding missions are not allowed to enter the region;
2) [Independent] Press and media are, as well, forbidden from entering the region;
3) Women and children are not allowed to leave the region of military operations;
4) Receipt of news indicates presence of violations and assaults for citizens aiming to terrorize the and forces them to emigrate from this region, through arresting the men and forcing women and their horrified children to escape later, on and leave the region aiming to build a military base there.”

Bush, who claims to be providing equal rights for women, religious freedom, and… hope, he condemns resistance fighters as not patriots but murderers at war with the Iraq people. It was the same message that King George promoted in the American colonies.

Bush reassures that he is disrupting militant conspiracies, and though there is the temptation, “in the middle of a long struggle to want peace and quiet,” he is on an incredible path of progress of spreading democracy around the world as “his” enemy goes weary.

Termed “The Long War” is just more than a military operation in Iraq or Afghanistan, as reported in the American Forces Press Service[4] by Army Brig. General Robert L. Caslen Jr., the Joint Staff’s directory of strategy for the global war on terrorism.

“Defeating an ideology is tough and will require time and resources to win, Caslen said. Defeating the appeal of fascism took almost 25 years. The appeal of this “ism” began soon after WWI ended and was not defeated until the Allies defeated extremism, the general explained.”[5]

“The terrorists have a battle plan, just as Adolph Hitler did. And like Hitler did in “Mein Kampf,” al Qaeda and affiliated groups have published their strategic goals, Caslen said.”

Does this mean that Caslen is comparing the Quran to Mein Kampf?

The advancement of the “Made In China” serves as the iconic power cluster of this administration’s scales of economic ambition, designed to entrap middle and lower class Americans, through the reduction of wage and social programs; pushing them into a spiraling network of debt by being forced to purchase offshore-made shoddy commodities, while working for paltry wages that keep them impoverished.

This was the same stark depiction of greedy power “emanating from London” by applying economic pressures upon the colonists that infuriated Washington to risk losing all his land, wealth, Mount Vernon, and his family’s security, by standing up against the corruption of English economic enslavement, even though he himself had served as an officer in the British Army.

When Washington instructed his currier, Cary & Company, in London to pay off his debt with a family inheritance, Cary refused, “correctly claiming that the two accounts were not transferable.” Such was the conniving character of the British government’s long-standing 18th century “Country Party” legislations enacted by Robert Walpole[6].

Ironically, this was the very same climate that spurred George Washington, who had an acute appreciation for the bottom line, to revolt against Great Britain, realizing that the British monarchy had purposely enslaved colonists through the dichotomy of a consignment system of purchasing necessary commodities (shoddy spin offs) from England and Europe.[7]

The 18th century Age of Enlightenment was the arbiter of human rights spurring on the ill-equipped, under-fed (over a 100,000 died from smallpox) never compensated by the Continental Congress, Continental Army and militia that defeated the greatest monarchical superpower in the world that dominated the sea, in troop strength and global occupation.

Remarkably, as right-wing Christians claim a Christian God guided His Excellency, such vanity would never have been tolerated in Washington’s persona; he would have disputed any such Christian idolatry projected upon him as his saving grace to victory.

“Never a deeply religious man, at least in the tradition Christian sense of the term, Washington thought of God as a distant, impersonal force, the presumed well-spring for what he called destiny or providence. Whether or not there was a hereafter, or a heaven where one’s soul lived on, struck him as one of those unfathomable mysteries that Christians theologians wasted too much ink and energy trying to resolve.”[8]

Against these superior odds, “His Excellency” solemnly reminded his troops at Valley Forge that it was their choice; slavery under Great Britain or prestige of a free nation ruled by their own sovereignty. He spoke full well knowing that they were fighting a war nearly devoid of federal empowerment, monetary compensation or armament resources, in comparison to the well-stocked elite British military.

George Washington wrote to James Madison in 1785, “We are either a United people, or we are not. If the former, let us, in all matters of general concern act as a nation; which have national objectives to promote, and a National character to support – If we are not, let us no longer act a farce by pretending to it.” [9]

Washington as adamant that no ‘self-created society’ should be allowed to carve out for themselves their own insurrections that represented tyranny, fouling the sensibilities of the Constitution. We have seen the wisdom of his words, as K Street lobbyists define American democracy, and insubordinate Swift Boat military veteran activists disgrace the sanctity of the “call to duty” military veterans, for political provocation.

Washington’s Newburgh Address, June 1783, inspired by an imminent American victory is poignant in defining America’s origin of purpose [the written record is indisputable in the manner of a statesman’s sentimental humility, characteristic of an American leader.]

It is crucial to make this point in accordance to Dahr Jamail’s recent dispatches of the “Swarm of Lies,” the contrast of American democracy against the harbinger of the Bush-Cheney totalitarianism.

In his characteristic humility, Washington warned,

“At this auspicious period, the United States came into an existence as a Nation, and if their Citizens should not be completely free and happy, the fault will be entirely their own.”[10]

Critics of Bush’s global posturing of military dominance are accused of being trapped in 20th century thinking, according to the Department of Defense.[11]

The report goes on to say,

“One day, historians will look back at what is being done today and say that our actions helped to make the world more peaceful, our military more formidable, and our freedom more secure; that America proved again to be the engine of ingenuity, innovation, and progress that it always has been in the past.”

Bush’s legacy is already noted as a an immoral revulsion, ballot box stuffing; a conspicuous demonstration of war profiteering, and blatant wrongness of creating human bondage by annulling civil liberties.

As Thomas Jefferson wrote, “the earth belongs to the living” it was George Washington who put this into practice.

George W. Bush is willfully destroying it.

###


[1] “Sources of civilian inmate labor are limited to on – and off-post Federal corrections camps facilities, State and/or local corrections facilities operating from on post-prison camps pursuant to leases under Section 2667, Title 10, United States Code (10 USC 2667), and off post State corrections facilities participating in the demonstration project authorized under Section 1065, Public Law (PL) 103-337.” Civilian Inmate Labor Program, 14 January, 2005 Headquarters, Department of the Army, Washington DC
[2] March 17, 2006
[3] Senator Feinstein’s husband, Richard Blum, who holds over 111,000 shares of stock in URS Corporation, the top defense contractor in the US, has since banked on the US occupation of Iraq, making $600 million in a contract with EG&G, the leading provider of technical services and management of the US military, with direct connections to The Carlyle Group. URS stock price has more than tripled since the war began in March 2003, allowing Blum to cash in on $2 million on his venture and another $100 million for his investment firm.
[4]Jim Garamone, March 20, 2006
[5] Army Brig. Gen. Robert L. Caslen, Jr. forgot to mention that George W. Bush’s grandfather, Prescott Bush assisted in building the Reich Bank’s fascist monetary funds.
[6] Ellis, Joseph J. His Excellency George Washington Vantage Press (New York), 2004
[7] Fairfax County Resolves, 18 July 1774, PWC 10:119-28, Donald M Zweig, “A New Found Washington Letter of 1774 and the Fairfax Revolves,” WMQ 20 (1983), 283-91. See also Washington to Bryan Fairfax, 20 July 1774, PWC 10:128-31
[8] Ellis, Joseph J., His Excellency, George Washington, Vintage Books, New York, 2004, p.151
[9] Washington to James Madison, 30 November 1785, PWCF 3:420
[10] Circular to the States 8, June 1783, WW 26:484-85; the “standing miracle” remark comes from Farewell Orders to Armies of the United States, 2, November 1783, WW 27:223
[11] http://www.dod.mil/home/articles/2004-09/a092304b.html

Index of Economic Freedom


BUSH’S WAR CHEST
(Written in 2006)

The belief that the sole moral obligation of humankind is the improvement of human welfare. If you have discarded the notion that the Bush regime isn’t gearing up for global war, think again. Tallying up the 2006 fiscal year’s budget for defense presents an alarming signal that the White House isn’t at all about spreading a peaceful democracy around the world, while at the same time spreading thin American’s quality of life.

It makes sense when you look at President Bush’s defense budget for the fiscal year of 2006, which is riddled with contradictions and duplicity. By the time Congress gets done with it, the Heritage Foundation's broad factors of the "Index of Economic Freedom" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Index_of_economic_freedom will be based, not to economic freedom, but US military control.

Today’s defense budget is $421.1 billion. Adding the $85 billion the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) price tag to continue fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, which is separate from the $82 billion recently requested and approved for 2005, American’s are paying for the highest Department of Defense budget since 1952.

You could add on the Department of Energy’s nuclear weapon program and this total then goes up to $526 billion, as the sum total of the 2006 national security budget.

But we’re not through yet. You need to add on the homeland security spending at $40.4 billion, foreign policy and international stability at $31.7 billion, and the human consequences of current and other wars in the form of the Department of Veterans Affairs at a tune of $68.3 billion.

The unbelievably grand total comes to $667.2 billion, which exceeds any annual sum this country has ever paid for security in any war at anytime. But the CBO claims this an inadequate amount, citing in 2004 that there was a $250 billion shortage in the Pentagon’s 2005-2009 plan. One can appreciate the price menagerie of Cold War weapons the Pentagon craves, but to say they are underfunded is absurd.

Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld has been countering with Congressional concerns of “over-programming” by scheduling a $30 million program cut, which he knows full well “won’t happen due to Pentagon bureaucrats-in-uniform and pork-sized members of Congress.”

What about the uniformed warrior’s needs and compensation? Just as Rumsfeld has chosen to exploit and exacerbate paying for the fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, the veteran’s community has been demanding gigantic increases in its healthcare, retirement and survivor’s benefits. This has whipped the political parties into a frenzy of each trying to outdo the other that in turn allows Rumsfeld to “wring compliance out of Congress” by sinking his excessive budget costs behind skeptic’s backs.

Budget cosmetics is the name of the game. For example, with the reorganization of the Army into smaller brigades and adding 30,000 troops, authorized by Congress last year, these expenses were dubbed “emergency” supplemental expenses so it wouldn’t count under the budget rule when “calculating whether the federal government heeds or fails to heed, spending ceilings for appropriations.”

Considering Bush’s expanding portfolio of a premature war of choice whose end is not in sight and an approach of transforming the military on unproven technologies that are cost prohibited for a large scale conventional war rather than countering terrorism, the investment amounts to astronomical costs that are virtually non-guaranteed. This is not the optimal strategy in keeping America safe and economically stable.

The Unified Security Budget has offered a way to balance our security budget without worsening the fiscal crisis. “It identifies $53.1 billion in cuts from the military budget and explains why each of them can be made with no sacrifice to security. The report goes on to identify “$40.4 billion in additional spending on nonmilitary tools and explains the role of each in building a more secure world.”

There is little quality assurance in Bush’s defense budget. We see an overwhelming expense that “allocates seven times as much on the military as on homeland security and all other nonmilitary security programs combined.” This is due to redundant weapons systems that have little or no relevance on fighting terrorism or peacekeeping stability operations. Additionally, the US military forces are currently overstretched in a poor-executed occupation of Iraq, by comparison the Taliban were defeated by a few thousand US troops and the continuing effort to capture Osama bin Laden with a stationary force of less than 20,000 troops.

What is more appalling is that Bush has spent $200 billion in seeking weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. It was agreed that during the 2004 presidential campaign the top priority of the US was to contain the spread of weapons of mass destruction, but to date only $1 billion has been allocated, “hardly spending commensurate with the label ‘top priority.’”

Bush continues to ignore the necessity of nonmilitary reallocation of resources that provide security through broad-based international affairs programs such as humanitarian organizations by “underwriting the sale of US made weapons to mostly nondemocratic regimes around the world.”

The public debate has yet to be fully heard, as American’s are starting to feel the affect of Bush’s overemphasis on building a military force to combat his version of terrorism. He has exacerbated the balance of social programs and has created a major escalation of federal deficits “compounded by a series of major tax cuts, has increased pressure on spending for our citizen’s education, health care, environmental protection, social security, and other public services.” Worse yet, within his ramping up for global war against terrorism, Bush has cut budgets for energy efficiency that would give America independence from foreign oil markets.

The Bush administration continues to suggest that the average American is ultimately benefiting from his liberation of Iraq, though the cost burdens to taxpayers is a detriment to their constitutional right for prosperity. And evidence further down the ladder, as I’ve already documented with the war profiteering goes even further.

We need to make a dramatic shift to nonmilitary means of securing our national security, a debate that has failed to keep pace in Congress. American’s need to connect to the fact that we have only so much in resource allocations, which our president refuses to acknowledge and clearly has a hidden agenda of global domination through military force.
http://www.heritage.org/Index/

Compiled from Center For Defense Information’s, The Defense Monitor, Volume XXXIV, Number 2 – March/April 2005

_The Mess in the Defense Budget, by Winslow T. Wheeler, Visiting Senior Fellow, and A Unified Security Budget for the United States, 2006: Balancing Military and Nonmilitary Tools, by Marcus Corbin, Senior Analyst_

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

America's Mission Statement

"Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required make swords as well.
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex.


The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.


We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted.

Only an alert and knowledgable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods an goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together."


US President Dwight D. Eisenhower

Friday, March 20, 2009

The last paragraph in Leo Tolstoy's War and Peace et al


"In the first case it was necessary to renounce the consciousness of an unreal immobility in space and to recognize a motion we did not feel; in the present case it is similarly necessary to renounce a freedom that does not exist, and to recognize a dependence of which we are not conscious."


So let us ease into our acquaintance with the great Russian master through his short story, “How Much Land Does a Man Need?” The story can be synopsized easily enough:

After slowly accumulating more and more property, a greedy Russian named Pahom hears that the Bashkirs, a minority race in Russia, are practically giving their land away. He decides to visit them and they offer him as much land as he wants, provided he can walk its perimeter in one day. Pahom agrees and goes out on his trek, but when the sun starts to set, he finds he has walked too far. Running back, Pahom collapses at the starting point just as the sun disappears behind the horizon. The Bashkirs try to congratulate him, only to find him dead. In answer to the question posed in the title, the Bashkirs bury him in a hole six feet long by two feet wide.



"Tolstoy's life has been devoted to replacing the method of violence for removing tyranny or securing reform by the method of non resistance to evil. He would meet hatred expressed in violence by love expressed in self suffering. He admits of no exception to whittle down this great and divine law of love. He applies it to all the problems that trouble mankind."
-Mohandas Gandhi
(19 November 1909) Introduction to the publication of Tolstoy's A Letter to a Hindu (1909)



"The Anarchists are right in everything; in the negation of the existing order, and in the assertion that, without Authority, there could not be worse violence than that of Authority under existing conditions. They are mistaken only in thinking that Anarchy can be instituted by a revolution. But it will be instituted only by there being more and more people who do not require the protection of governmental power…There can be only one permanent revolution - a moral one: the regeneration of the inner man."

-Leo Tolstoy

Merian C Cooper - post WWI and Polish-Bolshevik War


Merian C. Cooper as returned to America - after four years of European/Russian residency. Fighting in both WWI and the Polish-Bolshevik War of 1920, pronounced "dead" twice; and escaping a Bolshevik prison to trek 800 kilometers across the Eastern Russian outback to Riga, Latvia, Coooper wrote these thoughts upon his arrival to New York City in 1921.


"I must strike through unspeakable opposition, and fight battles every one of which costs me my heart's blood. Day and night I am in straits, for those enemies are so artulf that many I struck to death still give themselves the appearance of being alive, changing themselves into all forms, and spoiling day and night for me... Everywhere, and when I should least suspect it, I discovered on the ground traces of their silvery slime... they poured hell into my heart, so that I wept poison and sighed fire; they crouched near me even in my dreams; and I see horrible specters, noble lackey faces with gnashing faces and threatening noses, and deadly eyes glaring from cowls, and white ruffled hands with gleaming knives.


"And even the old woman who lives near me in the next room considers me to be mad, and says that I talk the maddest nonsense in my sleep; and the other night she plainly heard me calling out -- 'Dulcina [sic] is the fairest woman in the world, and I the happiest knight on earth; but it is not meet that my weakness should disown this truth. Strike with your own lance, Sir Knight!"

Pictured: Merian C. Cooper with Cedric Fauntleroy next to their Fokker D4 - during the Polish-Bolshevik War of 1920.

Tolstoy The Kingdom of God is Within You



Your duties as a citizen must be subordinated to the superior obligations of the eternal life of God, and cannot be in opposition to them. As Christ’s disciples said eighteen centuries ago, “Whether it is right in the sight of God to listen to you more than to God, you yourselves judge,” (Acts 4:19) and, “We ought to obey God rather than men.” (Acts 5:29)

Tucanred Imaging